The Death Penalty.

Bismilahirahmanirrahim..in the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful.

I greet you all my brothers and sisters of my muslim relatives with the Islamic greeting of peace. Assalamualaikum wbt.

Alright. In this entry I would like to argue and discuss about the death penalty not about the United Nations. Why I put that picture ? Well, read for further, then you will know.

"Why do you want to talk about this?"

Well, obviously it is one of our current issue right now. In facts, it is considered as one of the most hot topic which is being brought into an arena of debate. A world debate. Since 18th of December 2007, the United Nation actually was already proposed a resolution 62/149. This moratorium is regards with the abolishment of the use of the death penalty. Yup, they are trying to abolish the term of the 'death penalty' from any of the dictionaries of punishment. Actually I already post an entry which is pertaining to this entry entitled resolution 62/149 on 16th of November 2010. Click to that link for a further information about this resolution.

"Reason(s) of abolishment?"

They stand by their argument put forward by saying that the death punishment is correlated with our human rights. They used the term of 'violations of human right'.

Note: I'm afraid some of you will get confuse with the word 'they'. Here I am referring 'they' to the United Nations.

In Article 3 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides that everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. I bold the world 'right to life'.

Yes, they stand their argument with this article. They considering that the used of the death penalty undermines human dignity, and convinced that their resolution will lead to the enhancement and progressive development of human rights. At the same time they said that there is no conclusive evidence of the deterrent value of this penalty and that any miscarriage or failure of justice in the implementation of the death penalty is irreversible and irreparable.

Last year, in 2010 we could see Mongolia declared this moratorium and Gabon became the 16th African Union member country to abolish this kind of practice. Notice the words 'irreversible and irreparable' in the above paragraph? Well, they are trying to demonstrate these words with this video.

Enough said from their sides of arguments, and this is what I'm afraid of. I'm afraid if Malaysia also put the same action as what the Mongolia and Gabon did.

"Why ?"

First and foremost, i made my stand by saying that I am totally opposed this resolution because of the word "..world is free of the death penalty.." in which it is quoted by Shetty.

"Critically, define this sentence"

Simple, no more death penalty. Not even for a murders, rapes, terrorisms and etc. You name it, and it's mean, no death penalty at all. Now I would like to put a simple question. If they said that death penalty is a violence to what so called as right to life of Article 3 in Universal Declaration of Human Right, then what do you call that when a person being murdered by another person, and that murder is only sentence to imprisonment for five years, back then he's going back to his world of crime, murder, imprisonment, again and again ?

Ever heard the word of justice ?

Justice according to Ross, is the correct application of a law, as opposed to arbitrariness by making decision based on rule and law of evidence and trial, not by mere personal suspicion or opinion.

I would like to stress on the words 'the correct application of a law'. Yes, I agree that on a certain parts of a crime, the death penalty is not a right practice. I said, on a certain, Not all. That is why I stress on the words the correct application of a law. Because a murder deserved a death sentence. If you have already watched the video, here is my argument. Because of the system itself. First, listen carefully and you would hear the word jury.

"Who is jury ?"

A jury is a group of people, usually consists of 12 people who judge a court case. Members of jury are ordinary members of the public. Do they qualified and deserved to decide a case ?They are vulnerable in which their actions are easy to get affected by their feelings, not by their professional points of view based on laws and evidences.

I would like you to watch this video.

Stress on this part..

"...How misguided are you. I feed you with a couple of bullshit legal precedents and there you go. You jump on it (conclusion)..."

Imagine, even a judge could made a mistake, how about a jury ? I'm not put 100 percents blame on the jury, but on the system itself.

That is why they shouldn't put their arguments upon the death penalty. Because sometimes, even a smaller punishment, they might putting a false sentence. Then, you would say that we should abolished all the punishments to avoid any mistake ?

Next, this is Malaysia. An Islamic country. Treating a murders with a death sentence is something known as equality.

"O you who believe! Al-Qisas (the law of equality in punishment) is prescribed for you in case of murder: the free for the free, the slave for the slave, and the female for the female. But if the killer is forgiven by the brother (or the relatives, etc) of the killed against blood money, then adhering to it with fairness and payment of the blood money, to the heir should be made in fairness. This is an alleviation and a mercy from your lord. So after this whoever transgress the limits (i.e kills the killer after taking the blood money), he shall have a painful torment."

(Al-Baqara, verse 178).

Before this I already post an entry on 30th of October 2010, which is correlated with this verse. An entry entitle the law of equality in punishment. In this entry also, I already states that Malaysia does not sign the convention of the Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which providing to the right to life, including repeal the death penalty.

"In the law of equality there is (saving of) life to you O ye man of understanding! that ye may restrain yourselves. " (Al-Baqara, verse 179)

The enforcement of the Qisas is to ensure that the lives of other people is awake due to the fact that if those who understand will know that when they killed, they will be killed or sentence to death and thus he will not commit a murder.

note: I don't think I have to explain that on what circumstances did the death penalty is put upon a murder. I mean, for instance if you are accidentally killed a person in order to protect yourself, you are not going to put into a death sentence.

To strengthened my argument, we must understand that 'treat like cases alike' and 'treat different cases differently' as proposed and stated in the Book entitled "The Concept of Law" written by H.L.A Hart.

Last but not least, I would like to summarize my arguments into 4 points.

1. The death penalty should be abolish on a certain classification of crimes and not the entire and all types of crimes, as due to its degree of seriousness, the concept of equality and justice.

2. Malaysia does not sign the the convention of the Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which providing to the right to life, including repeal the death penalty, and thus Malaysia does not have to abolish it.

3. Malaysia is an Islamic country, so Qisas should be apply and no doubt about it as it is the law transcended by Allah and we should abide by it.

4. A mistake shouldn't be put towards the practice of the death penalty, but it should be put on the system and the body of authority and human error who does not treat the cases carefully who does not put the death penalty onto the right place and the right crimes.

Thank you. Asslamualaikum.. (^_^)

Approbation.

Bismillahirahmanirahim.

Assalamualaikum wbt.

I remember someone said to me before about Barack Obama will remove the military, thier troops in Iraq. But I replied by saying that "If I'm not mistaken, he (President of USA) needs to get an approval from the congress regarding this matter."

About removing..I'm not so sure. BUT, when it is regards to a military action, I mean, in simple English they called as a "Declaration of War", yes, this Mr. President need to get an approval or approbation from the congress.

oh yeah, before that. I'm talking about the system in America and not in Malaysia. So, this Mr. President represents one body and congress represents the other body. Some might question because they thought the system in America is same as the system in Malaysia. Yup, Malaysia and America both used the doctrine of 'separation of powers' but to be specific, America used the doctrine of 'strict separation of powers'. It means that a person may not be a member of other organs if he or she belongs to the other organ.

"huh ? What organ ? Did you mean this organ"

"Or...."

Of course not. What I mean is the body of authority.

Section 6 of article 1 in the United States Constitution provides that no person holding office under the US may be a member of congress. On the other words, Mr president are not a member of the congress.

Their part of the job is separated and so do their role.

Article 1 of United States Constitution also provides that all legislative power herein granted shall be vested in a congress and article 2 provides that the executive power shall be vested in a President of United States of America. Thus, this is clearly shows that in enforcing or executing an action, it must be regards with the approval from the congress. Done for the introduction.

"so, what's up with congress and all of this approval stuff? "

Like I mentioned before, the president need a declaration of war from the congress. If he wanted to enforce a military action, he (President) need to get a formal agreement from the congress. As has been stated in section 8 of article 1 in United States Constitution, in which these are among the power vested towards the congress;

"...to declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water....to raise and support armies....to provide and maintain a navy..."

If you read about my post entitle world's biggest crisis, you will notice about our current news which regards to a military action by United States of America towards Libya. Yes, about that, well, Mr. President actually failed to get an approval from the congress to take that action.

Micheal Dorf, a constitutional law expert and professor of law at Cornell University said that this action (military action towards Libya by United States of America) is considered as unconstitutional.

"The U.S military had no king. Unilateral choice of President Barack Obama to use U.S military forces in Libya is an insult to our constitution." Quoted Congressman Roscoe Bartlett.

ok, that's all from me. Thanks for reading. :)

"Society...has confirmed the role as president as chief legislator, but has not equipped the president to perform it with the reliability that British prime minister typically enjoy" ~ Bowles

The Quran Being Divine: Part 2

Bismillahiramanirrahim. Assalamualaikum wbt.

Alright, lets continue for part 2.

note: read from the first part (The Quran Being Divine: Part 1) so that you will understand better and it is easier for you to see the chronological of the facts.

At the time of Prophet Muhammad saw (PBUH), there are many of Quraishee poets tried to copy the Quran and yet, they end up with nothing and failed to do so. At the time of the Quran was revealed, there's no single person at that particular time had successfully imitate it. Even now, there's no one had done so. No matter how great that person, another person could imitate his or her style of writing. For instance, Shakespeare. His style of writing had been imitate by our modern poets, but for the Quran, none of them capable to do so.

If you read carefully about the Quran literacy form, you will see the difference between the Quran literacy form and Arabic poetry. In facts, the Quran is not a poetry.

"the Meccans still demanded of him a miracle, and with remarkable boldness and self confidence Muhammad appealed as a supreme confirmation of his mission to the Quran itself. Like all Arabs they were connoisseurs of language and rhetoric. Well, then if the Quran were his own composition other man could rival it. Let them produce ten verses like it, If they could not (and it is obvious that they could not), then let them accept the Quran as an outstanding evidential miracle" ~ Professor and Arabist Hamilton Gibb.

Now, we came to a part of the Quran vs science. The Quran which was revealed about 1400 years ago already states about the formation of the universe and our modern western scientist support it with their research, studies and discovery not that long ago.

Take one example, the creation of the earth and the heaven (langit dan bumi) were stated in the holy Quran.

"Lo! your Lord is Allah who created the heavens and the earth in six Days, then He established Himself upon the Throne, directing all things. There is no intercessor (with Him) save after His permission. That is Allah, your Lord , so worship Him. Oh will ye not remind?" (Yunus verse 3)

*note: if you notice that in this translation the first letter of the word 'Days' was in capital letter. I'm not doing so in purpose, it is already with the capital letter in the Quran translation and it is refers to 6 periods of time. You might go for translation in Bahasa Melayu, and you will find out like this; "...Allah yang menjadikan langit dan bumi dalam enam masa kemudian Dia bersemayam di atas Arasy mentadbirkan segala urusan. ...."

So, don't get confuse, it does not refers to 6 days, but it refers to 6 periods of time.

To make it clear so that you won't get confuse by the word 'Days', in Arabic, the word 'Yaum' bring the definition of day, but in all of these 6 ayat (Yunus verse 3, Al-A'raaf verse 54, Furqaan verse 59, As Sajdah verse 4, Qaf verse 38 and Al Hadiid verse 4), Allah swt used the word 'Ayyam' which is more accurately bring the definitions of 'period of time'.

In 1929, Edwin Hubble in which he is an American astronomer has discovered evidence that the universe began with a big explosion (big bang theory) and this great explosion is what seperates all of the body that was originally from one, seperated by a burst from each other. BUT, the Quran already states about this more than 1400 years ago. Even the smartest person in the world, the great scientist, Albert Einstein made a mistake which not even we, but Albert Einstein himself regarded that it is the biggest mistake of his career when he was initially believes that the universe had no beginning.

There's many more ayat that shows how this ayat go parallel with the theories proposed by science.

One last example.

"He had created the earth and heavens with truth. He maketh night to succeed day, and He maketh day to succeed night, and He contraineth the sun and the moon to give service, each running on for an appointed term. Is not He the Mighty, the Forgiver?" (Az-Zumar verse 5)

The words that say 'night to succeed day' and 'day to succeed night' is very important because the Arabic word that has been used is 'takwir' = 'membalut' or in english means 'make a wrap things' which is used to tell that 'night wrap day and day wrap night'. This particular information actually tells the exact form of the earth. and this 'wrap' thing will only happen if the earth is in the form of 'sphere'.

See, it's already stated in the Quran that the earth is in the form of sphere even though at that time an astronomies believes that the earth is flat.

That's all for this entry. Enjoy reading, and observe. ^^

Assalamualaikum..

"Will they not then ponder on the Quran? If it had been from other than Allah they would have ound therein much incongruity." (An-Nisa verse 82)

The Quran Being Divine: Part 1

I greet you all, my brothers and sisters of my muslim relatives with the Islamic greeting of peace, assalamualaikum wbt.

Before we go to our main ideas and purpose in this entry, let us salawat to our prophet Muhammad s.a.w (peace be upon him) and start with the most important part in which let us start with bismilahirrahmanirrahim. In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful.

Start our work with bismillah, insyaAllah, Allah will bless us as stated in hadith by prophet Muhammad s.a.w (peace be upon him) "any work started without reciting bismillah ar-rahman ar-rahim is without blessing"

There is a lots of evidences that show how the Quran being divine and now in this entry, I will share on a certain parts of it. The Quran was revealed to prophet Muhammad s.a.w (PBUH) a thousands years ago, but it is already states about the nature that human discovered about it not that long ago. Yes, the most common part to show how the Quran being divine is through the science.

However, before we go to that point, we must firm that the Quran cannot be emulated, reproduce or even copy which pertaining to its unique literacy form of the Quran. How can it be a copy from another source when it is the sole source of the new civilizations' philosophical, political and spiritual outlook and became the cause of the dramatic intellectual of deserts Arabs, and even after 13 years of the first revelation it became the only reference for a new state in Medina ?

If You doubt towards the Quran, then take this challenge; as has been stated in the Quran...

"If you are in doubt of what We have revealed to Our messenger, then produce one chapter like it. Call upon all your helpers, besides Allah, if you are truthful"

"Or do they say he fabricated the message ? Nay, they have no faith. Let them produce a recital like it, if they speak the truth"

*noted: this is just an extra knowledge for those who still do not know about this. If you notice that the term 'we' usually used in any of the Koran's translation. Well, don't get confuse, it does't mean that there is many of our god as muslim, but the reason is because when it is regards to His 'zat' (characteristics), He would use the plural pronoun to refer to a form of power. Interpretations among scholars, both past and then, for instance, Ibn Jarir al-Tabari, Ibn al-Andalusi Athiyyah, Ibn Kathir, Muhammad Ali al-Sabuni and many others agree that it is meant to refer to Allah swt.

Alright, let us get back to our main topic. As we can see that this is the challenge and this challenge to reproduce the Koran was showed in three stages.

1. The whole Quran.

'''say: ' if the whole mankind and jinss were to gather together to produce the like of this Qur'an, they could not produce the like thereof, even if they backed up each other with help and support''' (Al-Isra verse 88)

2. Ten chapters.

"Or they may say "He forged it." say "Bring ye then ten surahs forged, like unto it, and call (to your aid) whomsoever ye can, other than Allah!-if ye speak the truth!" (Hud verse 13)

3. One chapter.

"And if ye in doubt as to what We have revealed from time to time to Our servant, then produce a Surah like thereunto; and call your witnesses or helpers (if there are any) besides Allah, if your (doubts) are true" (Al-Baqara verse 23)

To be continue....

*guys, that's all for "The Quran Being Divine: Part 1" from me. I need to take a rest. It's already 4.03, Friday in the morning. I'll continue for second part after solat jumaat k. If I'm still have the strength to continue before solat jumaat, I will continue. ^^

Assalamualaikum..

'i' For Israel or 'i' For Islam..You choose.

Bismillahirahmanirrahim. In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful.

Alright, lest get straight to the point. All of us had face this kind of situation.

"dude, you wearing that ? It is a symbol of satan"

"then, should I take it off ?"

"of course."

OR

"you know what, I just read about the laptop that you just bought it yesterday, it is actually one of the Israel's conspiracy"

"Where did you read about it?"

"somewhere on the Internet"

(-_-ll)

Yeah. It is undeniable that nowadays most of us will take any of the news or trust 100 percents from the hearsay. Don't lie. That's our mentality today. Not all of us. but most of us. In a mean time, I'm not saying that we shouldn't trust it at all. What I'm trying to say is, take some time, do some research and think rationally.

It's like.."owh, that laptop..if I use it, its like I am cooperating with satan ? Ok, I'm gonna throw it out."

It's funny 'cuz every time you put your mindset towards all the hearsay, you are going to throw all of your stuff ? Think rationally, you use that laptop for what? For your convenience. For your own good.

Lately, some of you might received the messages about iPhone in which it said that 'i' stands for Israel. Again, take some time, do some research and think rationally and don't just rely only on one source. Sometimes, it's all depends on yourself. Either to look at it as 'i' for Israel or 'i' for Islam.

After all, always put your faith towards Allah. Let your life guided by the holy Quran and As-Sunnah, and live your life in Islamic way.

Assalamualaikum.. (^-^)

World's Biggest Crisis!

If you go and do some research on the internet, you would probably won't find any terms of 'war' as one of the biggest problem or crisis in the world. Trust me, I dare you to do so and what you could find is all about education, water, poverty and etc. In my points of view, there are two reasons for this;

1. Education, water and etc problem is actually killing more people than what is so called as 'war'. Tsunami killed over a millions of people in 2006 and recently in japan, it killed over hundred of thousands of people.

"what about education?". Well, an estimated of 101 million children are not in school in which more than half of them are girls. I know, at the end of the day, all of these girls will end up being either a part time or a full time chef at home. :P

Just kidding. Ok, lets get back to business, actually they are being denied for their basic human rights to education. Its hard to survive without education in our modern day right now.

"well, how about water? 70 percents of the earth are covered by water, so?". You've got a point there, but did they have not need to pay for the bills ?

"Because of that?" Of course not, what i mean is clean water. More than one out of six people have lack access to safe drinking water. 1.8 million people die every year from diarrhoel disease and 3900 children die every single day from water borne disease.

2. Because the terms 'war' is actually (for me) referred to the terms 'conflict' rather than refer it to the terms 'crisis'.

"If you say so, then what the hell with your title of your entry?"

Before I make my conclusion and gives you my answer, lets warm our brain up. To be a critical thinkers, one must not find the answer straight away, yet he or she should look for the reasons and application. Then you will understand the whole theory. Lets start with our world international issue in which it is correlated with the terms 'war'.

Yesterday, western forces hits targets along the Libyan coast by using strikes from the sea and from the air in order to force Muammar Gaddafi's troops to cease fire and end attacks on civilians. Later, an hour later in which by this morning on 20th of March 2011, United States of America and Britain warships and submarines 110 Tomahawk missiles against air defences around the capital Tripoli.

They attacks Libyan in order to stop that country from killing the Libyans' civilians, ironically, they also causes 48 of the civilians killed and another 150 injured. These leaders from USA, Britain, France, Canada and Italy had reached the consensus to take a military actions upon Libya after the claim that Gaddafi broke his pledge of a ceasefire overnight. This operation is called Operation Odyssey Dawn. This is parallel to enforced the United Nation's resolution.

This resolution was made to save the civilians (but at the same time causes a death and injury to them) and to counter attack this, Muammar Gaddafi said that he will use his civilians.

"now need to open all the buildings and provide the people with guns, with all kinds of weapons, to defend the independence, unity and dignity of Libya" ~ Quoted Muammar Gaddafi in his speech a few hours after the attack.

If you really think deeply about this particular thing, it is actually pertaining to something which we called as "Humanity Crisis". Yup, this war conflict is indirectly related to the "humanity crisis, lack of understanding". This can be said as the biggest crisis and problem right now. It is a field broad scope, humanity involving in our daily life, humanity in executing or enforcing a law and so on. But in this entry, I narrow it down into this particular terms...

"War: Lead To Lack of Humanity's Understanding Crisis"

You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for the war ~ Albert Einstein.

Make me understand better

Hey reader..

In this entry, I would like to talk about the techniques that you will use when you are in the middle of a discussion, or a debate or giving an advice to someone else or even when you are trying to persuade someone to believe in you. First of all, some of you might question to me what is the purpose of this entry actually. It is actually pertaining to what I faced during my final examination. Indirectly this could be a good lesson for me when ever my friends put their question upon me.

Here's the situation..

me: If you don't mind, could you please tell me a little a bit about the course that you've been taking right now.

Mr. A: Sure. First of all, we need to know did the course that I've been taking right now is legally in the eyes of law ? Yes, since Legal Profession Qualifying Board has been recognize this course in which LPQB is also recognize and establish by the Legal Profession Act under section 4 and 5 bla bla bla...

Can you see it. I'm asking this particular guy to tell, not to clarify or explain from the root point about this course. So, it is much more easier and better if this guy gives the simplest answer, yet it gives the whole pictures which regards to it. Ever heard about the Occam's Razor Theory ?

Occam's Razor Theory states that, in giving a theories, the simpler theory is to be preferred. Why ? For a better understanding. A doctor are not going to explain about the process and causes in your stomach. In contrast, he's just going to say that you are experience a food poisoning. That's it. So lesson number one, give a simplest ideas or example when I or who ever it is asking for consultation.

"But what if he or she is stupid enough to understand my simplest analogy? "

Stupid enough ? Then make them much more stupid. :)

Just Kidding, use the concept proposed by Harry Truman. "If you cannot convince them, confuse them"

" Don't you think that this concept is actually supporting your statement about make them much more stupid? " (-_-ll)

Did I ? hehe.. :P

So, lesson number two, do not and never ever use this concept proposed by Harry Truman when involving a situations like this. I mean, when it is regards to an educational matters. NEVER!

I remember when my schoolmate told me that his chemistry teacher said that "what a long answer, but I don't even know what is he trying to say". 5 science 1 and 5 science 2 have two different chemistry teachers. So, is this guy was trying to confuse his teacher in order to convince him ?

Second situation that this concept is not going to works is in a consumers-sellers-dealing stuff. Take a shot to look at ebay or mudah or etc statistics. A lot of stuff, minimal percentage of dealing matters. It is called "paradox of choice".

But, this concept might be works on a certain things especially when it is involving a political and economical matters. ^^

"Then ? The next solution iiissss..?"

If he still did not understand, ask him to go and look for another person.

What the hell..?

Gosh! It is totally freaking me out and totally weird !

"Why ?" Because recently I've been dreaming and thinking about the same person over and over and over again in my head.

"Huh! What is so weird about that ? " Because I never talk to that person and I am really seldom to see her. Obviously, she's not my classmate and so yeah, it's weird. o.O

But never mind, maybe I'm just envy with her since she got higher marks than me in test. And out of the blue, I am eager to know about her..and out of the blue again, I just get to know that her pointer for the previous semester is juuussssttt below me. :O

"First of all ?? work hard la..haizz..do I have to remind you every time dude ? " *sigh*

"secondly, errr...(one hour later..because I do really left my lappy, this entry for one hour).."

*to be continued....

immediately... (copy this quotes from The Simpsons Movie)

"errrrr...*it's a little bit hard when it comes to a part where I have to advice my self*.." It's called ~self-reflection~ yo.. ^^

ok. enough, it's already 3.16 in the morning. o.O Did not notice that.

p.s 1: when i said that i left my lappy for one hour..i'm just kidding. :P

p.s 2: I just got back home..yesterday my mom cannot make it to my campus, so my journey to go back home has been postpone for one day in which I should be already at home by yesterday. ^^

End of Semester 2

Bismillahirahmanirrahim..in the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful..

Now, the moment when I post this entry was exactly at 11.00pm on 15th of March 2011. Today is the last day of examination and by tomorrow I'll be going home. My parents will come and may we will have a safe journey. Amin.

so, yeah..I've done my best in my examination. Frankly speaking, the subjects on this semester is much more easier than the previous semester. As compared to before, we have to memorize and understand every single concept and doctrines of law proposed by the philosophers of law. Not to forget that I do really really really damn wanted to have my lucky 4 for this semester. 4 flat for my final exam and band 4 for my MUET. insyaAllah.. ^^

However, I felt a little bit disappointed with my carry marks on a certain subjects. Actually on the subject of Introduction to Law 2 only. It is not on my expectation. Alhamdulillah, thanks to Allah, I'm still have my momentum on my study. It's just that, there's a slight decreased on my carry marks of MTC037 (Intro To Law 2) beacause of my assignments. Not going to babbling on that, all I wanted to say is "find your best partners for your third and most important semester". Define "best partners" .

It can be defined as follows;

1. He or she are going to put 200 percents COMMITMENT on assignment

2. He or she knows how to COOPERATE to complete the assignment given ('cuz I hate chicken)

3. He or she are NOT GOING TO POSTPONE the works (really hate this habit)

4. He or she knows how to CONTRIBUTE MONEY on this assignment

5. He or she knows how to carry out a research. Every time have to consult ! *sigh* (-_-ll)

and other criteria(s) that is relevant.

Some might think that I am very cocky and act like a perfect person who never have any of these bad habit, yeah..i do have, but not every time and every single second. thank you.

p.s: and I don't like people who only knows how to copy and 'renovate' on someone else's assignments. Maybe you should reconsider back to continue your study if this is your attitude.

Enough with the lessons I learnt for my second semester. ^^

Oh yeah, not to forget, I'll try my best to upload and tell a litle bit about my activities on my second semester.

Last but nor least, happy holiday guys! yosh! (^_^)

soon..

bismillahirrahmanirrahim..

i greet u all with Islamic greeting of peace..assalamualikum wbt.

i've been thinking about this..i mean, i expect this to happen, in which i'm not going to up date or post any new entry on my blog when my second semester began. plus, that is what i've done in the past..i created this blog 2 weeks before my registration day for my first semester, and all that moment goes by without any new entry up till i finished my first semester. sigh..

i started to think that i don't deserved to have this blog..i have so many things in my head that i wanted to throw it out and paraphrase it into my damn blog..politics, law, friends, activities while in campus, test, assignments and so on. yet, it's all end up with nothing. but..nevermind.

i will have that moment since my second semester will be end for another 1 week. it's all about final exam before it ends.